📞 +91 98122 41001 ✉ info@kelvinindia.in 💬 WhatsApp
NSICMSMEISO 9001/14001/45001BISGeM-OEMCSIR-CMERIZED Pledged
Compare Tool

K-Drum vs K-Thermo — which fits your site?

Side-by-side comparison across 11 spec dimensions. Toggle capacity tier to see indicative CapEx + running cost change.

Pick a capacity tier to compare

Specification
K-Drum
K-Thermo
Heater
None — natural aerobic
Integrated, 55–65 °C
Cycle time
15-day initialisation, then daily
22–24 hours
Compost grade
100% natural organic
Pathogen-free, FCO-grade
Volume reduction
~50% (after curing)
Up to 60% (in-cycle)
MOC body
MSEP / FRP coating
SS 202 / MSPC outer
Mixing chamber
SS 304
SS 304
Energy use
Mixer only (~8 hr/day)
Heater + mixer (~8 hr/day)
Form factor
Drum-in-vessel, fixed
Wheeled cabinet, mobile
Civil foundation
Light pad needed
No foundation — castors
Best fit
ULB wards, campuses, cost-conscious sites
Hotels, hospitals, FMCG, pathogen-sensitive
Indicative running cost
~₹120/day
~₹240/day
Indicative CapEx
~₹6–8 L
~₹9–12 L

When K-Drum wins

  • Steady, predictable daily volume
  • Running cost is the deciding factor
  • You have room for a curing platform
  • Output is for landscape / agriculture use

When K-Thermo wins

  • Inputs include cooked food, dairy or meat scraps
  • You can't spare 15 days for initialisation
  • Site doesn't have civil works budget
  • Compost goes to "clean" use (vegetable garden, retail, CSR)

Still undecided?

Use the configurator — it'll recommend based on your inputs (use case, budget, site).

Start the configurator →
📞 Call 💬 WhatsApp Get a quote →